(202) 480-9706 — info@rturner.net

Details Matter

When it comes to submitting winning proposals for government contracts, paying close attention to details is absolutely crucial. Even seemingly small oversights can lead to an otherwise strong and compelling proposal being dismissed outright without much consideration. If a proposal does not comply with all requirements to the letter, the agency can simply discard it without further review - no second chances.

Demonstrating Professionalism and Reliability

Beyond simply checking the boxes on mandatory requirements, a keen eye for detail serves to demonstrate professionalism and reliability to the agency personnel reviewing your proposal. Inconsistencies in areas like spelling, acronym usage and definitions, how your company name is presented, and adherence to any specified formatting guidelines all get scrutinized. These types of details show whether your team has truly taken the time and effort to put your best foot forward with a polished, meticulous submission. Sloppy details riddled with errors and inconsistencies signal that corners were likely cut, planting seeds of doubt about your firm's capabilities right off the bat.

Avoiding Legal Pitfalls

Perhaps most critically, any inaccuracies around key items like official project names, government offices, standards, regulations, and the like are problematic - as they can potentially have legal ramifications down the road. Misrepresenting such details, even inadvertently, also implies a lack of understanding about the fundamental subject matter of the project being proposed on. This casts doubt on the bidding firm's qualifications and readiness to truly take on the work in a fully compliant manner.

Accurately representing all such details to a tee demonstrates that your firm has a comprehensive, up-to-date grasp on the specific project you are proposing to work on. It shows you've done your homework and are unlikely to make rookie mistakes once engaged.

Best Practices for Flawless Proposals

To ensure your proposal is utterly devoid of even the smallest detail errors or inconsistencies, implementing some best practices is critical:

  1. Manage a "Virtual War Room"
  • Keep a running log with a list of all relevant acronyms, their definitions, and any recent updates/changes to them
  • Note any key project/agency terminology referenced in the solicitation itself, even if it appears outdated or inconsistent
  • Track typical areas that need updates or "find and replace" revision between repurposing contents from past proposals
  • Ensure you’re not using outdated Information. Government agencies frequently update names, acronyms, and standards. Double-check all references to ensure your proposal reflects the latest information.
  • Double-check for accuracy. Utilize online resources and government websites to verify the accuracy of all information included in your proposal.
  1. Conduct Thorough Third-Party Reviews
  • Have one or more objective parties removed from the proposal process comprehensively proof the final submission
  • This "fresh set of eyes" should scour for any inconsistencies in formatting, spelling, acronym use, references, etc.
  • They should also catch any lingering copy/paste remnants containing outdated info or references to old projects
  • Overall they must validate strict adherence to every single guideline and requirement spelled out
  • Remember that spell-check tools can't identify everything. A final review can ensure consistency in terminology, sentence structure, and overall flow.
  1. Follow Proven Rules of Thumb
  • Make a point to always define common govcon acronyms at their first use (e.g. IDIQ, RFP, etc.)
  • Only skip definitions for the truly rare, ubiquitous acronyms that are more familiar than their proper names (who can you name that knows what NASA stands for?)
  • Use a consistent styling approach for punctuation with quotation marks and parentheses throughout
  • Adhere strictly to any compliance rules provided about which font, font size, spacing and other formatting matters to follow

By diligently going through this level of rigor to get every last detail right, you demonstrate your firm's commitment to doing whatever it takes to be a trustworthy, reliable, and utterly professional partner to the agency. Cutting corners is not an option.



Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published